Glide vs picasso

Glide's loading times are faster and it uses a small amount of memory 
for cache, but the library size is quite large. It, too, is easy to 
implement. Glide might be a better alternative to Picasso when memory
footprint is less of a concern or more and larger images need to be processed

Glide and picasso difference

Memory consumption: Glide occupies less memory as compared to Picasso. Reason being is Picasso loads full images doesn't matter what ImageView dimensions are mentioned, where as Glide loads image from server for the ImageView size (height/width)
Library size: Glide is heavier in terms of library size as compared to Picasso.
Number of methods: Glide is having more number of methods as compared to Picasso.
GIF Support: Picasso doesn't support GIF image loading.

Similar codes

0 vote321 views1 answer
Android bottomnavigationview leaves blank space after full screen
Kotlin
1 vote323 views1 answer
Kotlin datetimeformatter
Kotlin
0 vote307 views1 answer
Play sort audio android kotlin
Kotlin
1 vote270 views1 answer
Sectioned recyclerview android kotlin
Kotlin
1 vote363 views1 answer
Kotlin arrow function
Kotlin
0 vote341 views1 answer
Get week of the year kotlinm
Kotlin
0 vote311 views1 answer
Java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException when i try to set value in Muttablelist kotlin
Kotlin
0 vote388 views1 answer
Link to bitmap
Kotlin
5 votes356 views2 answers
Android recyclerview scroll to bottom
Kotlin
2 votes313 views2 answers
Make function kotlin
Kotlin