Glide vs picasso

Glide's loading times are faster and it uses a small amount of memory 
for cache, but the library size is quite large. It, too, is easy to 
implement. Glide might be a better alternative to Picasso when memory
footprint is less of a concern or more and larger images need to be processed

Glide and picasso difference

Memory consumption: Glide occupies less memory as compared to Picasso. Reason being is Picasso loads full images doesn't matter what ImageView dimensions are mentioned, where as Glide loads image from server for the ImageView size (height/width)
Library size: Glide is heavier in terms of library size as compared to Picasso.
Number of methods: Glide is having more number of methods as compared to Picasso.
GIF Support: Picasso doesn't support GIF image loading.

Similar codes

-1 vote307 views1 answer
Kotlin localdate
Kotlin
0 vote337 views1 answer
Android studio add line at end of class
Kotlin
1 vote307 views1 answer
Sp to px kotlin
Kotlin
1 vote316 views1 answer
Getsystemservice in fragment kotlin
Kotlin
0 vote316 views1 answer
Update binding viewmodel
Kotlin
0 vote318 views1 answer
Copy function in kotlin not working with livedata
Kotlin
2 votes342 views1 answer
Return@foreach not working kotlin
Kotlin
1 vote328 views1 answer
Kotlin var init check
Kotlin
1 vote326 views1 answer
Date format kotlin
Kotlin
0 vote340 views1 answer
Kotlin indices
Kotlin