Glide vs picasso

Glide's loading times are faster and it uses a small amount of memory 
for cache, but the library size is quite large. It, too, is easy to 
implement. Glide might be a better alternative to Picasso when memory
footprint is less of a concern or more and larger images need to be processed

Glide and picasso difference

Memory consumption: Glide occupies less memory as compared to Picasso. Reason being is Picasso loads full images doesn't matter what ImageView dimensions are mentioned, where as Glide loads image from server for the ImageView size (height/width)
Library size: Glide is heavier in terms of library size as compared to Picasso.
Number of methods: Glide is having more number of methods as compared to Picasso.
GIF Support: Picasso doesn't support GIF image loading.

Similar codes

0 vote357 views1 answer
Android studio recyclerview show item bottom
Kotlin
2 votes374 views1 answer
Run breaker kotlin
Kotlin
2 votes362 views3 answers
Kotlin var and val
Kotlin
6 votes411 views2 answers
Okhttp dependency
Kotlin
2 votes345 views1 answer
Data type in kotlin
Kotlin
0 vote349 views2 answers
Get map by index kotlin
Kotlin
0 vote383 views2 answers
Kotlin while loop
Kotlin
0 vote354 views1 answer
Kotlin map filterNot
Kotlin
2 votes373 views1 answer
Kotlin access variable from another class
Kotlin
5 votes370 views1 answer
Arraylist kotlin
Kotlin