Glide vs picasso

Glide's loading times are faster and it uses a small amount of memory 
for cache, but the library size is quite large. It, too, is easy to 
implement. Glide might be a better alternative to Picasso when memory
footprint is less of a concern or more and larger images need to be processed

Glide and picasso difference

Memory consumption: Glide occupies less memory as compared to Picasso. Reason being is Picasso loads full images doesn't matter what ImageView dimensions are mentioned, where as Glide loads image from server for the ImageView size (height/width)
Library size: Glide is heavier in terms of library size as compared to Picasso.
Number of methods: Glide is having more number of methods as compared to Picasso.
GIF Support: Picasso doesn't support GIF image loading.

Similar codes

2 votes355 views1 answer
Kotlin int
Kotlin
1 vote406 views1 answer
Object kotlin
Kotlin
1 vote401 views1 answer
Calling kotlin from java
Kotlin
1 vote385 views1 answer
Kill other apps in kotlin
Kotlin
0 vote399 views1 answer
Kotlin static field
Kotlin
4 votes408 views1 answer
Format string kotlin
Kotlin
1 vote389 views1 answer
Kotlin not configured android studio
Kotlin
4 votes341 views5 answers
Kotlin toast.maketext
Kotlin
1 vote392 views1 answer
Kotlin datetimeformatter
Kotlin
-1 vote380 views1 answer
Kotlin localdate
Kotlin