Glide vs picasso

Glide's loading times are faster and it uses a small amount of memory 
for cache, but the library size is quite large. It, too, is easy to 
implement. Glide might be a better alternative to Picasso when memory
footprint is less of a concern or more and larger images need to be processed

Glide and picasso difference

Memory consumption: Glide occupies less memory as compared to Picasso. Reason being is Picasso loads full images doesn't matter what ImageView dimensions are mentioned, where as Glide loads image from server for the ImageView size (height/width)
Library size: Glide is heavier in terms of library size as compared to Picasso.
Number of methods: Glide is having more number of methods as compared to Picasso.
GIF Support: Picasso doesn't support GIF image loading.

Similar codes

0 vote364 views3 answers
Kotlin hello world
Kotlin
1 vote392 views1 answer
Typeerror: undefined is not an object (evaluating
Kotlin
0 vote385 views1 answer
Kotlin long max value
Kotlin
1 vote400 views1 answer
Kotlin download file from url
Kotlin
4 votes434 views1 answer
Kotlin online compiler
Kotlin
0 vote401 views1 answer
Kotlin filternot
Kotlin
0 vote413 views1 answer
Kotlin labels
Kotlin
1 vote365 views1 answer
Length of array kotlin
Kotlin
1 vote382 views1 answer
Kotlin copy list
Kotlin
5 votes450 views1 answer
Random string generator kotlin
Kotlin