Glide vs picasso

Glide's loading times are faster and it uses a small amount of memory 
for cache, but the library size is quite large. It, too, is easy to 
implement. Glide might be a better alternative to Picasso when memory
footprint is less of a concern or more and larger images need to be processed

Glide and picasso difference

Memory consumption: Glide occupies less memory as compared to Picasso. Reason being is Picasso loads full images doesn't matter what ImageView dimensions are mentioned, where as Glide loads image from server for the ImageView size (height/width)
Library size: Glide is heavier in terms of library size as compared to Picasso.
Number of methods: Glide is having more number of methods as compared to Picasso.
GIF Support: Picasso doesn't support GIF image loading.

Similar codes

0 vote268 views1 answer
Kotlin coroutine channel
Kotlin
2 votes249 views1 answer
Kotlin for ios
Kotlin
1 vote258 views1 answer
Nullpointerexception kotlin
Kotlin
0 vote290 views1 answer
Kotlin swithc
Kotlin
3 votes272 views1 answer
Make map kotlin
Kotlin
0 vote264 views1 answer
How to get index of item in arraylist in kotlin
Kotlin
0 vote237 views1 answer
Kotlin enum serialization
Kotlin
0 vote264 views1 answer
Kotlin inline function return
Kotlin
0 vote271 views1 answer
Kotlin change editable to Int
Kotlin
0 vote269 views4 answers
Kotlin queue
Kotlin