Git rebase vs merge

Git rebase and merge both integrate changes from one branch into another. Where they differ is how it's done. Git rebase moves a feature branch into a master. Git merge adds a new commit, preserving the history

Git rebase vs merge

If you want to see the history completely same as it happened, you should use merge. Merge preserves history whereas rebase rewrites it.
Rebasing is better to streamline a complex history, you are able to change the commit history by interactive rebase. 
You can remove undesired commits, squash two or more commits into one or edit the commit message.
Rebase will present conflicts one commit at a time whereas merge will present them all at once.
It is better and much easier to handle the conflicts but you shouldn’t forget that
reverting a rebase is much more difficult than reverting a merge if there are many conflicts. 
You can find details of a basic rebase process from git — Basic Rebase .

Git pull vs rebase

git pull fetches the latest changes of the current branch from a remote and applies those changes to your local copy of the branch. 
Generally this is done by merging, i.e. the local changes are merged into the remote changes. So git pull is similar to git fetch & git merge.

git pull --rebase :
The local changes you made will be rebased on top of the remote changes, instead of being merged with the remote changes.

Similar codes

1 vote196 views1 answer
How to remove samba ubuntu
Shell/Bash
0 vote180 views1 answer
How to install asterisk 16 on debian 10
Shell/Bash
0 vote180 views1 answer
Change php version devilbox fish
Shell/Bash
0 vote184 views1 answer
How to use uf
Shell/Bash
4 votes183 views2 answers
Find in file linux
Shell/Bash
0 vote178 views1 answer
Install crate rust
Shell/Bash
1 vote167 views1 answer
Getcomposer
Shell/Bash
3 votes172 views2 answers
Revert a migration django
Shell/Bash
5 votes185 views1 answer
The most profitable business in zimbabwe
Shell/Bash
1 vote201 views1 answer
Ip config ubuntu
Shell/Bash