Git rebase vs merge

Git rebase and merge both integrate changes from one branch into another. Where they differ is how it's done. Git rebase moves a feature branch into a master. Git merge adds a new commit, preserving the history

Git rebase vs merge

If you want to see the history completely same as it happened, you should use merge. Merge preserves history whereas rebase rewrites it.
Rebasing is better to streamline a complex history, you are able to change the commit history by interactive rebase. 
You can remove undesired commits, squash two or more commits into one or edit the commit message.
Rebase will present conflicts one commit at a time whereas merge will present them all at once.
It is better and much easier to handle the conflicts but you shouldn’t forget that
reverting a rebase is much more difficult than reverting a merge if there are many conflicts. 
You can find details of a basic rebase process from git — Basic Rebase .

Git pull vs rebase

git pull fetches the latest changes of the current branch from a remote and applies those changes to your local copy of the branch. 
Generally this is done by merging, i.e. the local changes are merged into the remote changes. So git pull is similar to git fetch & git merge.

git pull --rebase :
The local changes you made will be rebased on top of the remote changes, instead of being merged with the remote changes.

Similar codes

0 vote387 views3 answers
Git branch specific files
Shell/Bash
0 vote339 views1 answer
Ubuntu 21.04 mingw download
Shell/Bash
1 vote407 views1 answer
Install hugo on ubuntu
Shell/Bash
3 votes346 views1 answer
Mount in linux
Shell/Bash
0 vote331 views1 answer
Protractor npm
Shell/Bash
0 vote419 views1 answer
Bash read xlsv
Shell/Bash
35 votes370 views4 answers
Npm uninstall eslint
Shell/Bash
0 vote349 views1 answer
How to install gitlab on mac os
Shell/Bash
1 vote362 views2 answers
How to install xfce
Shell/Bash
5 votes348 views1 answer
Openssl read cert
Shell/Bash